Benchmarking NVIDIA P100 for compute bound performance

Previously I posted NVIDIA P100 performance results for full ECHELON runs which are dominated by memory bound kernels. Above I'm showing fresh P100 results for compositional flash, one of the few compute bound kernels found in reservoir simulators. For this chart the reference SPE3 problem is solved using a 10 component flash calculation on 1 million pressure-temperature points. Platforms considered are an 8 core Intel Haswell E5-2630v3 and the Fermi GF200, Kepler GK210 and new Pascal P100 chips from NVIDIA. Performance results are normalized to Haswell=1.0. Our single-core CPU results compare very closely, both in accuracy and performance, to the highly-optimized results published by Haugen and Beckner from ExxonMobil (  Here, however, we improve upon Haugen and Beckner with a multi-threaded parallel implementation. Three conclusions: i) P100 is 42x faster than the 8 core Intel Xeon Haswell chip ii) performance per TFLOP is about 2.5x better on GPU than CPU and iii) GPU performance again scales in a beautiful linear manner with TFLOPs. In summary there is a vast and growing performance gap between Intel Xeon chips and NVIDIA GPUs for both memory bound and compute bound kernels. This is great news for those interested in bringing game-changing capability to reservoir simulation.

Previous PostECHELON and the NVIDIA P100
Next PostECHELON: The vanguard of next generation technical software